BEM and asp.net mvc -

-

can faced integration of asp.net mvc , bem (http://bem.info/)? can introduce examples or links tutorials?

i cannot provide code examples, since not use asp.net. in case theoretical answer can help, here is:

first of all, can use css & file system parts of bem. mean can separate css code block components , store them in individual files.

blocks/     button.css     footer.css     header.css     login.css

then, can gather files css files pages @import. flatten files, use borschik (https://github.com/bem/borschik). btw, might interested in released borschik sever https://github.com/bem/borschik-server , dev tool.

then, if ready go further, can provide javascript files individual components , store such files css files of components.

blocks/     button/         button.css         button.js     footer/         footer.css     header/         header.css     login/         login.css         login.js

similar css, can use these pieces of javascript per-page javascript bundles. of course, there no keyword in javascript similar @import. here again borschik can help. if have page.js file content following:

borschik:include:blocks/login/login.js borschik:include:blocks/button/button.js

run borschik on file , _page.js file content inlined. further information recommend article borschik on bem.info http://bem.info/articles/borschik/

if bored linking every block css file of page , again js file of page, there way unify that. can use bem tools https://github.com/bem/bem-tools. them possible create call page declaration in json. then, according declaration bem tools bundle both css , javascript files pages. , other techs, if need them. comment gets quite long. so, won't describe using bem tools here. if documentation not enough, please ask.

the last point templating system. guess asp net has one, doesn't it? if razor, must similar tt2 (perl). met such projects , can describe did.

they use 2 'layers' of templating. first 1 native embedded templating system. output not html usual bemjson page description. when, due having node.js bindings, possible run server-side javascript on json. in server-side javascript use bemhtml templates. can taste of 'quick start` article http://bem.info/articles/start-with-project-stub/ or tutorial http://bem.info/articles/bemhtml-intro/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more