ServiceStack: Impossible to use SOAP with custom namespace when AuthFeature is enabled? -

-

i have need host couple soap12 messages in current ss webapi. have set of namespaces according rules , works expected, extent. can use multiple tools send soap service(s) , work. have added them service reference in visual studio project work; @ least until add authfeature. add authfeature or other native ss service, can no longer add service reference.

my investigation has lead me namespace difference between datacontract(s) in servicestack.serviceinterface.auth namespace used in authservice. don't want limited authservice though, same applicable when swaggerfeature added , resources service set up.

it imperative these 2 messages available in soap , client must have ability add them service reference consume them.

my question: there way set datacontract namespace(s) native ss services keep namespace consistent our datacontract namespace? understand "could" compile , maintain own version of ss have ability change contractnamespace attributes of causing issues cause lot of undo pain in maintenance when attempting keep ss updated original source.

i realize attributes ([datacontract]) compile time constants , when servicestack compiled namespace getting set. looking alternatives...

taken apphost:

setconfig( new endpointhostconfig             {                 metadatatypesconfig = new servicestack.common.servicemodel.metadatatypesconfig(                     adddefaultxmlnamespace: namespaces.services.ns_2013_01 ),                 wsdlservicenamespace = namespaces.services.ns_2013_01,                 wsdlsoapactionnamespace = namespaces.services.ns_2013_01,                 //wsdlservicetypesnamespace             } );

taken assemblyinfo:

[assembly: contractnamespace( "foo", clrnamespace = "mvcapplication1.serviceinterface" )]

there "hack" reversed, buildin services default namespace 

 http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/servicestack

so instead of trying use own namespace, use namespace.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more