java - AspectJ pointcut in object-aspect is not working -

-

i can't find out why pointcut not working. compiler not give warnings, cannot explain why not working. i'm using aspectjrt 1.7.2 , aspectjtools 1.7.0 in maven javafx application.

my aspect looks this

public privileged aspect movieaspect perthis(movieinit()) {  pointcut movieinit(): execution(movie.new(..));  pointcut reloadmainpanelview(): cflow(execution(void main.views.mainframe.mainpanel.fillmainpanel(..)));  before(arraylist tar): target(tar) && reloadmainpanelview() && call(void java.util.arraylist.clear())                        && !within(movieaspect) {     system.out.println("test"); }

my movieaspect located in package main.models

and here little explanation of happening within code

when gui loads initialize mainframe class. before aspect loads movie-objects. , when mainframe initializes views movie-objects in mainpanel first clears view-objects , reloads them. because added views listener corresponding movie-object need remove them again. of course before calling clear-method of arraylist know why pointcut not working. movieaspect-objects instantiated, tested movieinit() pointcut.

does have clue, why pointcut not work? pointcuts on outer classes in same package or not not work except in class movie.

hope can help.

edit:

this catch constructors of movie-class doesn't matter. after hours of research found solution. text explains behaviour

4.3.4 implicit limiting of join points

using per-object or per-control-flow association has side effect of implicitly limiting advice in aspect join points match scope of aspect instance. scope of aspect instance set of join points have aspect instance associated them. example, percflow() association, scope of aspect instance join points occurring inside control flow of specified pointcut. means if pointcut specified advice matches join point, advice join point won’t apply unless join point matches scope of aspect. side effect surprises developers when refactor aspect create reusable parts , need use per- associations. aspect association implies advice in aspect apply join points if:

■ perthis() associations, join point’s execution object matches aspect instance’s associated object.

■ pertarget() associations, join point’s target object matches aspect’s associated object.

■ percflow() associations, join point in control flow of aspect’s associated control flow.

■ percflowbelow() associations, join point below control flow of aspect’s associated control flow.

are sure movieinit() pointcut catches call movie constructor? movie constructor method default constructor or user-defined one?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more