AngularJS with Flask authentication -

-

i'm building web app using angularjs , rest-api build flask framework.

the app consists of 2 parts:

  • a part users don't have logged in: can register, login, check out features...

  • a part users have logged in.

to keep things simple thinking separate these 2 parts in 2 angular apps , let flask direct right app according being logged in or not.

i wondering if approach? think can keep authentication pretty simple.

i'm not sure 2 separate apps idea.

it seems have fair amount of duplication if way, because don't think 2 apps mutually exclusive. @ least, imagine public options available when user logged in, right? means chunk of public application, client , server-side, have part of protected application. sounds hard maintain.

also consider user experience. user have download entire new application @ login , logout time, @ least first time until gets in browser's cache. depending on size of application few seconds of waiting.

the standard approach have 1 angular app , 1 flask app. angular app begins , shows available options, , depending on user angular sends ajax requests flask.

if user tries requires login, flask respond code 401 error. angular can show login dialog login credentials , submit ajax request again, credentials, maybe http basic authentication on secure http. on angular can attach login credentials requests, user can use options.

if don't want send login info every request, can have get_auth_token endpoint in flask app takes credentials , sends token angular. angular can attach token subsequent requests.

the logout option in angular drops credentials and/or token become unauthorized again.

i explain of these ideas more detail in this answer. though context in question node.js principles apply flask well.

you can check out tutorials on topic. i'm using flask on server , knockout.js on client, concepts should translate directly if use angular instead of knockout. here 3 of them:


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more