javascript - Calling ko.applyBindings on dynamic elements not working -

-

i have chat room style application , each entry processed on client once received , html generated display it. messages have tooltips , other bits of data embedded within them use knockout bindings display.

now after looking on posts around answers problem seem be:

  • make sure elements exist front empty
  • call ko.applybindings on new elements when added

the first 1 not feasible create elements chat comes in server, second option seems way it, require calling each chat message comes in. lot of people ko.applybindings can incur significant overheads, think mean if call upon elements rather targeting specific ones.

just on same page, here basic snippet of view around area matters:

<!-- ko foreach: {data: chatroom.entries, afterrender: chatentryrendered } -->    <div class="entry-content" data-bind="html: processedcontent"></div> <!-- /ko -->

ignoring bits around that, loop around each entry, add div contain html contain bindings need knockout goodness applied. example processedcontent like:

<span>some content <span data-bind="tooltip: 'some content here'">dynamic</span> bit of <span class="special-text">content</span></span>

so above html not processed foreach dynamically applied page, , before starts freaking out injecting html views, server not send down markup, sends down string load of tokens client converts html. without muddying waters much, in scenario chatroom.entries object culled every , again fluctuate 0-200 (usually 100-200) entries @ given time , rest of chat entries cached in local storage, there never more 150 bound entries view @ given time.

here jsfiddle showing issue in practical example.

http://jsfiddle.net/mps4q/8/

the main reason html binding doesn't bind inserted html because can unsafe. if know it's safe, can use custom binding bind contents. here's example question: https://stackoverflow.com/a/17756777/1287183

fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/mps4q/9/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more