ransack - Rails page search form: default parameters -

-

i have 2 rails sites, bargain stock funds (http://www.bargainstockfunds.com) , doppler value investing (http://www.dopplervalueinvesting.com).

bargain stock funds has search feature allows users obtain list of funds meeting criteria. (the url http://www.bargainstockfunds.com/funds .) doppler value investing has search feature allows users obtain list of stocks meeting criteria. (the url http://www.dopplervalueinvesting.com/stocks/ .) both sites use ransack gem provide search feature , kaminari gem paginate results.

is there way can configure search engines pre-loaded criteria set? bargain stock funds, want search engine pre-configured exclude funds load_front or load_back value greater 0.0%, , want results sorted respect value of pcf parameter. doppler value investing, want search engine pre-configured exclude funds pass_legit value of false or pass_quality value of false, , want results sorted respect value of dopeler_pb parameter. these pre-configured settings save user trouble of having hunt around criteria in drop-down menus.

the source code search form bargain stock funds is:

<%= search_form_for @search, url: search_funds_path, method: :post |f| %>   <%= f.condition_fields |c| %>     <%= render "condition_fields", f: c %>   <% end %>   <p><%= link_to_add_fields "add conditions", f, :condition %></p>   <div class="field">     sort:     <%= f.sort_fields |s| %>       <%= s.sort_select %>     <% end %>   </div>   <div class="actions"><%= f.submit "search" %></div> <% end %>

the source code search form doppler value investing quite similar. (just replace "funds" "stocks".)

not sure i'm following. "search engine" mean google? or mean applications searching logic?

if latter, may help: https://stackoverflow.com/a/14553363/1797331

i'll have check out sites. developing similar, focused on stock fundamentals -- haven't done lately. might inspire me.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more