java - Why does List interface extend Collection interface? -

-

the collection interface has multiple methods. list interface extends collection interface. declares same methods collection interface? why so?

for example

interface collection extends iterable {      public abstract int size();  public abstract boolean isempty();  public abstract boolean contains(java.lang.object);  public abstract java.util.iterator<e> iterator();  public abstract java.lang.object[] toarray();  public abstract <t extends java/lang/object> t[] toarray(t[]);  public abstract boolean add(e);  public abstract boolean remove(java.lang.object);  public abstract boolean containsall(java.util.collection<?>);  public abstract boolean addall(java.util.collection<? extends e>);  public abstract boolean removeall(java.util.collection<?>);  public abstract boolean retainall(java.util.collection<?>);  public abstract void clear();  public abstract boolean equals(java.lang.object);  public abstract int hashcode(); }

and same methods present in list interface:

public interface list extends collection {  public abstract int size();  public abstract boolean isempty();  public abstract boolean contains(java.lang.object);  public abstract java.util.iterator<e> iterator();  public abstract java.lang.object[] toarray();  public abstract <t extends java/lang/object> t[] toarray(t[]);  public abstract boolean add(e);  public abstract boolean remove(java.lang.object);  public abstract boolean containsall(java.util.collection<?>);  public abstract boolean addall(java.util.collection<? extends e>);  public abstract boolean removeall(java.util.collection<?>);  public abstract boolean retainall(java.util.collection<?>);  public abstract void clear();  public abstract boolean equals(java.lang.object);  public abstract int hashcode(); }

is requirement write these methods again in list if extending collection interface?

they're re-written can documented, in order specify how list refines contract of these methods compared contract specified in collection interface.

for example, add() method in list documented specify element added end of list. can't specified in collection, since collection doesn't have beginning , end.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more