using method inside asyntask in android -

-

i have created 1 simple login application takes user name , password sqlserver..it works fine...

i want during login process 1 progeress bar should displayed using asyntask... unaware use parameters in asyntask...if 1 plzz tell me how put method in doinbackground of asyntask , param should use....

my code is;.....

public void save(){     initilize();     resultset rs = null;     string mylog=id.gettext().tostring();     string mypass=pass.gettext().tostring();     try{     statement statement=connect.createstatement();     rs=statement.executequery("login '"+mylog+"', '"+mypass+"'");     }catch(exception e){         e.printstacktrace();     }      if(mylog.equals("")||mypass.equals("")){          toast.maketext(getapplicationcontext(), "empty fields", toast.length_short).show();      } else         try {             if(rs.next()){                  intent i=new intent(getapplicationcontext(),act2.class);                 startactivity(i);             }             else if(rs.next()==false){                  toast.maketext(getapplicationcontext(), "incorrect login", toast.length_short).show();                 id.settext("");                 pass.settext("");             }         } catch (sqlexception e) {             // todo auto-generated catch block             e.printstacktrace();         } }

if possible same method save() kept inside doinbackground() of asyntask...

making fast refactorization (note stand it's bad practice , coding, must refactor code more maintanable , avoid duplication):

public class myasynctask extends asynctask<> {

private activity activity; boolean result; private string mylog; private string mypass; private connection connect;

public myasynctask(activity activity, connection connect) {     this.activity = activity;     this.connect = connect; }  @override protected void onpreexecute() {     //show progress dialog }  @override protected object doinbackground(object[] objects) {      resultset rs = null;         activity.runonuithread(new runnable() {             @override             public void run() {                 initilize();                 mylog=id.gettext().tostring();                 mypass=pass.gettext().tostring();             }         });          try{             statement statement=connect.createstatement();             rs=statement.executequery("login '"+mylog+"', '"+mypass+"'");         }catch(exception e){             e.printstacktrace();         }          if(mylog.equals("")||mypass.equals("")){             activity.runonuithread(new runnable() {                 @override                 public void run() {                     toast.maketext(activity.getapplicationcontext(), "empty fields", toast.length_short).show();                 }             });           } else             try {                 if(rs.next()){                 result = true;                  }                 else if(rs.next()==false){                      activity.runonuithread(new runnable() {                         @override                         public void run() {                             toast.maketext(activity.getapplicationcontext(), "incorrect login", toast.length_short).show();                             id.settext("");                             pass.settext("");                         }                     });                  }             } catch (sqlexception e) {                 // todo auto-generated catch block                 e.printstacktrace();             }      return null; }  @override protected void onpostexecute(object o) {     //hide progress dialog     if(result == boolean.true){         activity.runonuithread(new runnable() {             @override             public void run() {                 intent i=new intent(activity.getapplicationcontext(),act2.class);                 activity.startactivity(i);             }         });      }  } }

then in activity this:

myasynctask = new myasynctask(this, connect); //im guessing "connect" connection object a.execute();

as said made fast refactoring code work best practice , implementation not in consideration here.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more