Can a SilverLight component instantiate a registration-free COM-visible .NET object -

-

we trying load in silverlight 5.0 component running in ie com-visible .net object registration-free using activation context api. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms973913.aspx

the silverlight component runnning trusted application in browser described in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg192793(v=vs.95).aspx.

the object can loaded in stand-alone test application using activation context api manifest formed. in siverlight running inside browser, component loader dll (loaded appdata/locallow) creates , activates activation context fails load com-visible .net object dll appdata/locallow. result "the file not found".

does have experience silverlight/com in similar setup?

tia

i filed ticket microsoft , suggested solution workaround actual activation context bug.

 //create own activation context pointing manifest  actctx actctx;  ulong_ptr pctxcookie;  //initialize actctx manifest name , path  ....  handle hactctx = createactctx(&actctx);  activateactctx(hactctx, &pctxcookie);  ....  //surround every call createinstance null activation context, otherwise error on deactivateactctx!!!  ulong_ptr cookie; //do not reuse pctxcookie!!!  activateactctx(null, &cookie); hresult hr = classa.createinstance(__uuidof(sxsnet::sxsclass));  deactivateactctx(0, cookie); //deactivate null context  ...  //deactivate , deallocate actual manifest based activation context  deactivateactctx(0, pctxcookie);  releaseactctx(hactctx);

the solution not work. problem solution null context forces binding registered version of .net assembly not 1 using isolated context. there bug in registration-free com when invoking .net assemblies because of binding search logic not in manifest location @ @ gac , bin path of process.

according microsoft:

this error occurs because fusion probing failing .net assembly managed com component defined , implemented. .net runtime probes files relative exeuctable path or global assembly cache. reg-free managed com interop ignores root manifest path.

i hope helps in future.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Which browser returns the correct result for getBoundingClientRect of an SVG element? -

-
this svg contains rect overflows svg element: <svg id='svg' width='10' height='10'> <rect x='-10' y='-10' width='30' height='30'/> </svg> chrome 28 , opera 12 return getboundingclientrect() svg element width , height of 10. firefox 23 reports width , height of 30. correct? jsfiddle the relevant spec cssom , delegates svg spec if svg element not "have associated css layout box". haven't found definition of "having associated css layout box", correct result seem hinge on definition, getbbox returns 30x30 rect in browsers. this firefox bug fixed now, fix in firefox nightlies , should make through firefox 33 released on 14 october 2014. see bug 530985 details.
Read more

gcc - Calling fftR4() in c from assembly -

-
i trying asm fft implementation www.embeddedsignals.com work. running make gives error: undefined reference fftr4(short*, short*, int) at top of asm have .syntax unified .thumb .global fftr4 .type fftr4, %function and there #define's associate c functions arguments registers followed macros fftr4 function uses. after that, fftr4 called .thumb_func fftr4: stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr} mov tmp0, #0 // bit reversed counter mov tmp1, #0 .word 0xf3a2fa92 //rbit r3,r2 //rbit r,n lsl r,#3 and c code follows: void fftr4(short *y, short *x, int n); short x[512]; short y[512]; int i; void loop() { (i=0;i<512;i++) x[i]=0; (i=0;i<512;i=i+8) { x[i+0]=16384; x[i+2]=16384; x[i+4]=-16384; x[i+6]=-16384;} fftr4(y, x, 256); serialusb.println(y[128]); serialusb.println(y[129]); serialusb.println(y[384]); serialusb.println(y[385]); // expected results: //y[128]is 8191; y[129] -8190 y[...
Read more

.htaccess - Matching full URL in RewriteCond -

-
i'm trying block post access site (and return 403), except 2 ip's , 1 url ( http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/ ). here's have: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !=4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !^http://mydomain.com/about-us/contact-us/$ rewriterule ^ / [f] these rules allowing access ip properly, contact page still not accessible. i'm not sure i'm using request_uri correctly? i've tried variations relative urls rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us$ , rewritecond %{request_uri} !^/about-us/contact-us/$ without luck. what doing wrong please? it looks me rule on file name specific. if relax bit, should work. made few other esthetic tweaks. give try: rewritecond %{request_method} post rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^1.2.3.4 rewritecond %{remote_addr} !^4.3.2.1 rewritecond %{request_uri} !about-us/contact-us rewriterule ^ - [f]
Read more